Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2021 1:56:33 GMT -5
I am easily lead astray by verbal cues, and distracted by their semantics, so I mostly observe ct visually. So I decided to do a visual nonverbal analysis of "A day in my life | Lex Fridman". Morning and Mantra: 0:14 - 1:49 confessional, reading script, particular disposition of hands on lap(fig 1., extrapolated, don't know how it's called), very few expressions, quite controlled hands until 1:49 1:49 - 3:47 abstract hand gestures, 2:07 opening up (to vulnerability?) => gravitas => broken gravitas => gravitas again, 3:04-3:09 reaching into mind for a particularly difficult thing to verbalize(PoLR strategy or Si) 3:47 - 4:42 unignoring Te, elements of Se, 4:42 re-alignment into stone Watching a video without any audio is quite exhausting, and if I were to watch the whole thing and only then compile my observations, I'd probably not ever reach that stage. So I'm gonna be sending snippets of what I analyze, always with the probability of not following up on it. Right now I am giving myself a break on the analysis. I should probably also develop stamina in doing it. fig 1. EDIT: It's not a full ct analysis yet, as I have used ct only in places where I only knew how to describe it with ct. Deep Work Session: 5:23 - 6:02 forehead folds, "casting spells", guilty expression, a lot of "rough" head tilts and other head movements, stepping back and forth, 5:40 - 5:42 light-heartedness (=> gravitas), 5:59 sharply furrowing eyebrows 6:02 - 6:14 golem-ish with a lot of Te, 6:11 subtly furrowed eyebrows, 6:13 bulging eyes (Ni?) 6:14 - 7:08 nonchalant, 6:21 right eyebrow twitch, 6:25 "to heart" with Fe overtones, 6:31 Ni pop fizzle, afterwards a "judge me if you want to, idc" vibe,
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Jun 10, 2021 17:33:43 GMT -5
Deep Work Session: 5:23 - 6:02 forehead folds, "casting spells", guilty expression, a lot of "rough" head tilts and other head movements, stepping back and forth, 5:40 - 5:42 light-heartedness (=> gravitas), 5:59 sharply furrowing eyebrows 6:02 - 6:14 golem-ish with a lot of Te, 6:11 subtly furrowed eyebrows, 6:13 bulging eyes (Ni?) 6:14 - 6:17 nonchalant, 6:21 right eyebrow twitch, 6:25 "to heart" with Fe overtones, 6:31 Ni pop fizzle, afterwards a "judge me if you want to, idc" vibe,
Just to be sure @ash , those function identifications, like"golem-ish with a lot of Te" or "Fe overtones" are from images alone, without any audio, right ?
Anyway, i'll take another look at that video and at your analysis of it soon.
tbcd
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 10, 2021 17:41:58 GMT -5
For some reason I missed Part 2 but I just printed it out so I can watch with it easily.
Then I can try to apply it when I rewatch the Lex-Ben intertype ballet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2021 10:02:30 GMT -5
Deep Work Session: 5:23 - 6:02 forehead folds, "casting spells", guilty expression, a lot of "rough" head tilts and other head movements, stepping back and forth, 5:40 - 5:42 light-heartedness (=> gravitas), 5:59 sharply furrowing eyebrows 6:02 - 6:14 golem-ish with a lot of Te, 6:11 subtly furrowed eyebrows, 6:13 bulging eyes (Ni?) 6:14 - 6:17 nonchalant, 6:21 right eyebrow twitch, 6:25 "to heart" with Fe overtones, 6:31 Ni pop fizzle, afterwards a "judge me if you want to, idc" vibe,
Just to be sure @ash , those function identifications, like"golem-ish with a lot of Te" or "Fe overtones" are from images alone, without any audio, right ?
Anyway, i'll take another look at that video and at your analysis of it soon.
tbcd
yes, and unlike the video with Ana, I have no clue what he's saying. It's a purely visual observation, without much if any exposure to audio.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 13, 2021 8:21:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 13, 2021 13:54:49 GMT -5
|
|
ahmed
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 166
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by ahmed on Jun 16, 2021 13:56:23 GMT -5
Lex pushed back with pointing towards the morality questions, but imo it wasn't the sort of push back an FiNe would do, because in a situation & a setting like that, they will be the ones holding the neck and obscurifying (is that a word? ). And towards the end of the interview he stopped pushing questions of that sort either and/or acknowledging their limitations more. No, it's not a word. People (on google search) are playing with it as though it were to name companies and stuff but it's not. We have the word 'obfuscate' but I'm not sure if that's what you mean. 'Obfuscate' has a clearly negative connotation while the 'rendering obscure' of FiNe will often be as a means to elucidation. I think you may just mean 'obscuring'. 'To obfuscate' is more like 'to block' while 'to obscure' is more like 'to conceal'; but with 'holding the neck'...what do you mean? I meant controlling the flow of ideas with "holding the neck" while also pointing to how the NeTi's destruction of binarism still does not answer what the questions were getting at. I think very early on, up until the "good and evil" bit and the 40mins in (at least with the ordering of the questions but i'm going off memory now >_> i have been extra busy with school and not able to rewatch or do much lately, but will get back when im more on track with stuff hopefully)
|
|