anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Jun 26, 2021 20:29:10 GMT -5
To the purple questions: First: Okay, in that video you linked, moments like those were rare. Seriously. I watched full vlogs of his years ago, and that sort of thing almost never happened. Most of the time it was JUST severe, and the children were very obviously not acting. Okay but the thing is that kid wasn't acting in that video either and what was going on behind the scenes I'm sure was very similar. He would have been meting out rewards and punishments ambivalently, oscillating between reactively punitive and endearing.
Second: L6 Authoritarian Rebel L7 Overreacting Dependent L8 Paranoid Hysteric L9 Self-Defeating Masochist So to your question, if he's so vulnerable, why WOULD he put it on YouTube where everyone can see and attack him, there's your answers.
Also I learned self-abasing.
Third: Probably not, no. Fourth: No, I didn't report him for child abuse. I discovered him after the controversy, and I doubt I would've reported him in 2017 had I the chance. Why? Because you asked what he was overreactively dependent on. He was overreactively dependent on the audience and was testing the slothful voyeurism he had thrust himself without boundaries in the center of.
And to finally be able to achieve self-abasing masochism was a tension release. But I see he got to make at least 279 videos before he was able to fully abase himself.
anthony, oops sorry, I accidentally edited instead of replied.
|
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Jun 26, 2021 21:05:14 GMT -5
To the purple questions: First: Okay, in that video you linked, moments like those were rare. Seriously. I watched full vlogs of his years ago, and that sort of thing almost never happened. Most of the time it was JUST severe, and the children were very obviously not acting. Okay but the thing is that kid wasn't acting in that video either and what was going on behind the scenes I'm sure was very similar. He would have been meting out rewards and punishments ambivalently, oscillating between reactively punitive and endearing. Okay, yes. I see what you're saying. That's exactly the impression I got from him, oscillating between punitive and endearing, ultimately making the KIDS ambivalent and anxious as well("Undefined rules").Second: L6 Authoritarian Rebel L7 Overreacting Dependent L8 Paranoid Hysteric L9 Self-Defeating Masochist So to your question, if he's so vulnerable, why WOULD he put it on YouTube where everyone can see and attack him, there's your answers.
Also I learned self-abasing.
Right, I get it. Btw I pulled these health level names from the Study Hall.Third: Probably not, no. Fourth: No, I didn't report him for child abuse. I discovered him after the controversy, and I doubt I would've reported him in 2017 had I the chance. Why? Because you asked what he was overreactively dependent on. He was overreactively dependent on the audience and was testing the slothful voyeurism he had thrust himself without boundaries in the center of. And to finally be able to achieve self-abasing masochism was a tension release. But I see he got to make at least 279 videos before he was able to fully abase himself.
Hmmm. I see what you mean, yes. I didn't see him as really trying to self-abase, nor to measure 'against' his audience how much he could and couldn't get away with. He basically just struck me as a negligent, myopic idiot with zero awareness of the seriousness of his behavior. It was like HE didn't suspect that he was doing anything wrong, so why would the audience?anthony , oops sorry, I accidentally edited instead of replied.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 26, 2021 21:14:30 GMT -5
Second: L6 Authoritarian Rebel L7 Overreacting Dependent L8 Paranoid Hysteric L9 Self-Defeating Masochist So to your question, if he's so vulnerable, why WOULD he put it on YouTube where everyone can see and attack him, there's your answers.
Also I learned self-abasing.
Right, I get it. Btw I pulled these health level names from the Study Hall.
I guess I better check.
Hmmm. I see what you mean, yes. I didn't see him as really trying to self-abase, nor to measure 'against' his audience how much he could and couldn't get away with. He basically just struck me as a negligent, myopic idiot with zero awareness of the seriousness of his behavior. It was like HE didn't suspect that he was doing anything wrong, so why would the audience? Well, his behavior wasn't truly serious--as long as he was allowed to get away with it. And that was a pretty long time. It really hasn't been clear what is and isn't allowable since YouTube took off and the election of Trump and the Chans and all the rest of it. So he tested the waters.
But if he didn't know what he was doing could be considered serious, why would he have thought anyone would care to watch? Of course he knew a lot of it was on the edge.
|
|