Post by Roshan on Dec 2, 2020 11:47:45 GMT -5
ps tbc the bifurcation of E6 is not only not unique, it is not even a bifurcation but an oscillation . There are very few 'just' phobic or counterphobic Sixes oc. E6 is a fixation around fear, being the center of the head center this is about survival strategy: it will try to fight, flee, freeze, follow and/or sometimes fawn its way into the future.
Similarly E2 as the exteriorized aspect of the heart center is a fixation around Pride, and this is pride in life-giving through relatedness. Two is at bottom the Mother archetype. But there is no Mother archetype without a child. This is the oscillation of E2--to succor or to lure someone to succor you. (And then there is the payback aspect...) It's also btw why 6 and 2 'wormhole', dependency--conscious or not--being massive concerns with both.
And just like Naranjo was wrong to say the muscle-bound 6 is always sx variant, he was also wrong that the child Two is always sp. And so it goes. Really once the EI and the IEA decided to back Don's protegés', the Chernick-Fauvres', lego toy approach to micromanagement of the trityped soul, it was time for everyone to admit you can't have both. You can't admit that many factors and keep things as simple and as tidy as you had them before. But no.
It was also time to admit (as I said elsewhere here and will no doubt say again) that everyone's lead type was now up for question, including RH's, Naranjo's, the Chernick-Fauvres'...but also no. And here we are and the beat goes on. And also shifts, so resquiescat in pace, Claudio, Don. Also Oscar. Not to mention David Daniels, Elizabeth Wagele...the beat will go on.
Yes, indeed, gamma in general (and NiTe in particular, due to what we call Fe PolR and Te tool) can be remarkably unsentimental. 'As such', I wouldn't worry about the quality of the online discourse. I'd worry about having reliable exemplars where you can explain why this or that type leads and that other doesn't, and answers on hand to some of the thorny but tedious questions that just keep coming up. All you can really do at this point is bring in better quality where possible; oftentimes the practice of triage will have to be applied.
Similarly E2 as the exteriorized aspect of the heart center is a fixation around Pride, and this is pride in life-giving through relatedness. Two is at bottom the Mother archetype. But there is no Mother archetype without a child. This is the oscillation of E2--to succor or to lure someone to succor you. (And then there is the payback aspect...) It's also btw why 6 and 2 'wormhole', dependency--conscious or not--being massive concerns with both.
And just like Naranjo was wrong to say the muscle-bound 6 is always sx variant, he was also wrong that the child Two is always sp. And so it goes. Really once the EI and the IEA decided to back Don's protegés', the Chernick-Fauvres', lego toy approach to micromanagement of the trityped soul, it was time for everyone to admit you can't have both. You can't admit that many factors and keep things as simple and as tidy as you had them before. But no.
It was also time to admit (as I said elsewhere here and will no doubt say again) that everyone's lead type was now up for question, including RH's, Naranjo's, the Chernick-Fauvres'...but also no. And here we are and the beat goes on. And also shifts, so resquiescat in pace, Claudio, Don. Also Oscar. Not to mention David Daniels, Elizabeth Wagele...the beat will go on.
Yes, indeed, gamma in general (and NiTe in particular, due to what we call Fe PolR and Te tool) can be remarkably unsentimental. 'As such', I wouldn't worry about the quality of the online discourse. I'd worry about having reliable exemplars where you can explain why this or that type leads and that other doesn't, and answers on hand to some of the thorny but tedious questions that just keep coming up. All you can really do at this point is bring in better quality where possible; oftentimes the practice of triage will have to be applied.