|
Post by Roshan on Aug 17, 2020 15:49:14 GMT -5
Holly a few years ago.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Aug 17, 2020 16:03:36 GMT -5
Sorry, the Nagle thread is under construction. Here she is. I'm not so hot on Doug Laine's opening characterization of civic nationalism but whatever. These two women are very similar but Angela's the 9 and Holly's the 2. But I wouldn't be surprised if either or both were typed as Six lead because something or other. And Holly's the sp dom, as videos such as how to repair an antique sewing machine attest to, while Angela seems to be what I call a "garden party white gloves so/sp", a soft-spoken genteel one. But she carries a big stick.
First part and end.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Aug 21, 2020 8:46:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Aug 22, 2020 9:38:09 GMT -5
Kim Klacik, young politician, seems to be 2w3(1w2) with 6 and 9. I'm interested in her stacking here though. She may be so/SP. She seems to be using the sx/so<--sp/sx elements of 2w3 unabashedly in an so/sp way. Coming down from Mount Sinai with the Tablets of the Holy Harlot. Yes, she may not have come up with the idea but still she was willing to go through with it. What do other people think? She could still be e.g. sp/SO.
(I have to add that I am genuinely puzzled at this point at the incessant accusations of the absolute monolithic racism of all Fox News. Maybe the accusers don't really follow Fox News? I get that they would say Laura Ingraham is just using Kim for insidious ends, but to me it seems that Ingraham--herself apparently a One in Two with 3 in Two--just loves Kim.)
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Aug 22, 2020 14:39:36 GMT -5
Willing to go through with it and able to pull it out.
Not everyone would.
so/SP seems right to me.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Aug 30, 2020 12:14:47 GMT -5
Is Holly Seeliger FiSe?
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Aug 30, 2020 15:34:39 GMT -5
Yes i think she is.
That kind of statuesque presence is almost certainly Se auxiliary. And she doesn't lead with Ti.
Fi frame makes perfect sense for her imo. Actually, she is (almost) always talking to "You", as in a virtual interpersonal, inter-individual dialogue. Ti role/Te seeking also makes sense, from what i've seen so far.
I don't see major evidence of Ni tertiary overcollapsing, or Ne polr "mud factor", nor obvious example of Si 6th. But that's probably health level related.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Aug 30, 2020 16:00:32 GMT -5
I don't see major evidence of Ni tertiary overcollapsing, or Ne polr "mud factor", nor obvious example of Si 6th.But that's probably health level related. Well, I think the Si sixth is built into the Se second. That's what gives the statuesque presence. Se itself is more like dentable pillow and/or coil spring. Also she is majorly concerned with physical survival issues. But I agree she doesn't have that categorical way of expressing herself, delve into issues of contamination or show disgust, lapse into homilies, etc. The obvious example of Se was at the end when she concluded that she was glad the legislature was using its muscle.
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Aug 31, 2020 13:44:52 GMT -5
Yes, i agree, Si 6th is built into Se second.
That's probably why you don't see this kind of presence with Se primary or tertiary.
And she does show some Si indeed, she just don't weaponize it.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 4, 2020 9:50:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 23, 2020 18:29:31 GMT -5
woo hoo! I may have just stumbled on an sx 2w3 by accident when I had this sudden urge to nurse my wounds. hmmm...did I just say nurse my wounds?...tbcd
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 23, 2020 18:30:38 GMT -5
Maybe sx/sp 278 or sx/so 279w8...or...something...
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 23, 2020 18:34:50 GMT -5
I'll say offhand she is in certain ways very reminscent of Princess Diana, also of she who is Raindrops fall...but obviously only in ways.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 23, 2020 18:40:09 GMT -5
But Maria Brink is by my reckoning sx/so 2w378 or something very close to that so if I'm right generally speaking about both of them Bonnie Tyler must be sx/sp. The Deitrich-like sucking in quality of those bedroom eyes....sx/so really doesn't quite have this...and anyway sx/so with 2w3, and 7 and 8 space--that is a lot of just assertion. Maria radiates out. Bonnie sucks in.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Sept 23, 2020 18:56:05 GMT -5
However I do wonder if Bonnie Taylor may be sp/sx...I mean as a 2w3 which is already archetypally the most sx/so there is...and with apparently a lot of gluttony and lust (even if the next two fixes are wrong they're not that wrong...and with that gravelly voice etc...however comparing to LDR she is very different...but LDR seems to have movement into the Hole (6w5[5w4])...I moved her from 6w7 after some time with her there for several reasons...They would probably also have different ranges...
I mean...if Dr. Ramani can be sp/SX with those big bulging eyes...okay, just bouncing around ideas...
|
|