|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2021 10:26:13 GMT -5
Okay, you are probably right. My first impression (not that I didn't know her before, I just never thought about her type) was TeNi. But I didn't (and still don't) understand what's Si PolR about her--or for that matter, Ne demo. So I started toying with the possibility of TeSi but of course that doesn't work, she seems very gamma. I considered NiTe creative subtype briefly but even though she does have her jittery breaking points, she's too forward-thrusting overall. SeFi did not seem like an option. Then I did an image search and I wondered if she might not be FiSe with all functions/parallel development (so very strong Te), mostly because she reminds me quite a bit of Alejandra in still photos. She could just as easily be Katie's activator as her mirror (I think Katie may have worn make up because of Abby) and Matt's beneficiary as benefactor--unequals and distance remains. But she is probably just a somewhat tight-lipped (sort of withdrawing, not withdrawn) TeNi. So just how is she Si PolR and Ne demo, vincent ? |
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2021 10:36:52 GMT -5
#2 She is energetically similar to a first impression of Roxan (TeSi). Except Roxan quickly reveals herself to be softer, ungrounded, and a nervous wreck. But Roxan has those same diamantine piercing eyes with that same sense of determination, that 'this is important. You are important, but this is MORE important'. The issue with Roxan, what I realized working through 'this Abby thing', is that SHE has 'parallel development', and that's what makes her LOOK more TeNi than TeSi. The heavy Fi. But the gamma impression doesn't sustain itself, she is as Ni PolR as the day is long (and the day can get very, very long because of it).
The thing is (okay, full disclosure), Auburn said Peterson has parallel development (though as FeTi, which as we've discussed seems implausible) and that's why he has all this nervous energy, doesn't stop thinking out loud, and makes all those strange gestures. Roxan is like that. Abby isn't.
However if you watch Abby carefully, you will notice at certain times she 'breaks the set' energetic presentation and she is pretty all over the place. Reminding me of me, but the thing is I associate that kind of all over the place energy with Te mode 'female ENTJ', it's sort of 'crusty and brash', so...
|
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Apr 12, 2021 12:38:33 GMT -5
Okay, you are probably right. My first impression (not that I didn't know her before, I just never thought about her type) was TeNi. But I didn't (and still don't) understand what's Si PolR about her--or for that matter, Ne demo. So I started toying with the possibility of TeSi but of course that doesn't work, she seems very gamma. I considered NiTe creative subtype briefly but even though she does have her jittery breaking points, she's too forward-thrusting overall. SeFi did not seem like an option. Then I did an image search and I wondered if she might not be FiSe with all functions/parallel development (so very strong Te), mostly because she reminds me quite a bit of Alejandra in still photos. She could just as easily be Katie's activator as her mirror (I think Katie may have worn make up because of Abby) and Matt's beneficiary as benefactor--unequals and distance remains. But she is probably just a somewhat tight-lipped (sort of withdrawing, not withdrawn) TeNi. So just how is she Si PolR and Ne demo, vincent ?
Well, to be honest, i don't see any smoking gun proof of those either.
The thing Si polr in TeNi is often pretty hard to catch and at her level of health, i would expect it to be even harder to see.
i suspect she might be very aware of her polr weakness and working hard on keeping it in check.
Which might be, in part, why she is "somewhat tight-lipped (sort of withdrawing, not withdrawn)", as you said.
Maybe that's what she is kind of confessing when she says "i admittedly don't know as much as i should about Ukraine's history, the cultural dynamics of the region" in that clip from her RT show.
Also, I'm tempted to tell you the same thing i said about Peterson (iirc) : she seems to have some kind of immunity to bullshit narratives, and that might be the "canary in the coal mine" aspect of Si polr.
About Ne 6th, she doesn't seem to weaponize it or demonstrate it, per se, but she has intellectual and editorial balls of steel, so to speak, and that's a LOT of authority and i think it's consistent with integrated (or integrating) Ne 6th.
|
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Apr 12, 2021 12:48:56 GMT -5
#2 She is energetically similar to a first impression of Roxan (TeSi). Except Roxan quickly reveals herself to be softer, ungrounded, and a nervous wreck. But Roxan has those same diamantine piercing eyes with that same sense of determination, that 'this is important. You are important, but this is MORE important'. The issue with Roxan, what I realized working through 'this Abby thing', is that SHE has 'parallel development', and that's what makes her LOOK more TeNi than TeSi. The heavy Fi. But the gamma impression doesn't sustain itself, she is as Ni PolR as the day is long (and the day can get very, very long because of it). The thing is (okay, full disclosure), Auburn said Peterson has parallel development (though as FeTi, which as we've discussed seems implausible) and that's why he has all this nervous energy, doesn't stop thinking out loud, and makes all those strange gestures. Roxan is like that. Abby isn't.
That makes a lot of sense and it's very interesting.
fwiw, to me, Abby is more stereotypically TeNi than Peterson is, so to speak.
I feel like she would easily supervise me.
With Peterson, it's not that obvious. His configuration is very unusual and it blurrs the lines quite a bit.
Yes indeed.
And that association seems right to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2021 13:04:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Apr 12, 2021 13:22:40 GMT -5
Oh wow !
Right. That makes a lot of sense indeed.
This, from the link, really really resonates with Ne 6th/Si polr.
(Not that the rest do not, but it's especially striking here).
|
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2021 13:27:10 GMT -5
Yeah well vincent it conforms most to our understanding of it but as per the link she originally had a sledgehammer breaking a TV set screen. |
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Apr 12, 2021 13:47:52 GMT -5
Yeah well vincent it conforms most to our understanding of it but as per the link she originally had a sledgehammer breaking a TV set screen. Yes indeed, i saw that.
And she was holding that sledgehammer herself.
You're absolutely right, that's her Ne 6th/Si polr indeed.
|
|
