|
Post by Roshan on Jun 15, 2021 14:21:09 GMT -5
That's a link there btw ^ for Bert. vincent , I think the pluses and minuses are the Reinen dichotomies. Sylvia posted about them. I don't really care how contrived or even ridiculous some of the very Ti/Si-heavy socionics stuff turns out to be. I want to have base-level conversancy in the mains schools of thought AND I want to train my brain to understand what I do and don't disagree with and why....(and also and maybe especially to be able to apply this training elsewhere).
|
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Jun 15, 2021 14:27:34 GMT -5
Lol, I think you accidentally edited out the response text(did you?), and now I'm not sure if you're referencing my Bertrand Russell(B.Russell Sprouts) pfp or just referencing the Sesame Street skit.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 15, 2021 14:29:47 GMT -5
All my editing was very intentional and video carefully curated.- 2021 A.D. Muser, the world's newest jk.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 15, 2021 14:47:29 GMT -5
now I'm not sure if you're referencing my Bertrand Russell(B.Russell Sprouts) pfp or just referencing the Sesame Street skit. ps clue: well there is a) brussell sprouts b) sesame seeds c) all of the above d) none of the above e) me no speaky English (As a seasoned test giver I'm pretty sure those are the options anthony )
|
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Jun 15, 2021 15:08:19 GMT -5
🎵Adding adding adding🎵 here's my work! Roshan + letters and words + [insert x, x = amount of qualitatively processed info] = a very high dimensionality joke. My answer is c, for creativity. Now, please Don't Hug Me I'm Scared: (Remind me to never rap battle you).
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jun 15, 2021 15:11:03 GMT -5
Okay I won't hug you! But 9 is still the best number! (EDIT: oh hahaha just saw the video...was gonna say is that Cousin It drenched in blood and then it took a morbid turn, anthony )
|
|
ahmed
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 166
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by ahmed on Jun 16, 2021 13:45:13 GMT -5
Another unnecessary layer that doesn't add much to what function definitions and quadr(a descriptions already tells you.
There is something absurd imo in those attempts to "dissect" spectrums and synergies.
Which is one of the reason i was saying here that socionics is better with "macro" than with "micro")
(imo dimensionality isn't as absurd or arbitrary as most of the reinin dichotomies though ) theoretically it should account for the "lots of use vs way of use" problem with typing. (which..yea i would agree should/is covered by the stacking and slot dynamics first and foremost)
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Jul 19, 2021 17:48:24 GMT -5
This just in my inbox from JP "Mondays of Meaning" Monday Reflections.
I'm just the messenger atm.
On Perception as a Map
We don't perceive the world: not directly. There is just too much world to see, just as there is too much past to remember. We must restrict our limited vision and understanding to that which is of vital importance.
Think about it this way: when driving somewhere new, do you pay attention to the road, or the map? Obviously, you pay attention to both - but if the map was good enough, it could replace the road entirely.
It’s certainly the case, even now, that the maps provided by services like Google are of such quality that much of the attention of modern drivers remains focused there. It is easy to imagine a projection of a Google map onto the windshield, replacing the road itself (and that would work perfectly fine, as well as the map and the actual road matched well enough so that nothing interfered with the task of driving). This is very instructive, with regard to how you actually see the world.
Inconveniently, to say the least, this replacement of reality by map would only work if the future precisely duplicated the past, and it doesn't. New obstacles and opportunities emerge continually, although not at every level of being, at every moment.
The world is structured in a manner akin to music: some things remain the same—some themes repeat—but other things transform, sometimes dramatically, deeply and unexpectedly.
We employ habit, deterministic habit, to deal with the former. But we use consciousness, that deeply mysterious function (our awareness: malleable, unpredictable, difficult, imaginative, contemplative and slow) to deal with the latter. We perceive a map, constructed by our minds, overlaid on the world.
Much of our perception is memory, particularly as you gain experience—and that’s a good thing, because it is very hard to see the world, in its full, high-resolution complexity, and because it is very difficult to update the map, particularly if it has remained unchanged for a very long time, and is deeply embedded in habit.
|
|