|
Post by Roshan on May 13, 2020 5:59:26 GMT -5
I could throw my sp 9w8 sister in traits of Aspect 2 too. In fact she's the biggest I'm Not Shoutinger of them all. She also has some Aspect 1 'lack of affect'. Her c.t. is either TeSi creative subtype or SiTe. I'm not positive my father's was SiFe either but something very close to that.
Pseudo-Brando must have been a 6 after all but with a massive 9w8 fix and definitely triple attached.
It stands to reason that a condition of being dissociated from the experience of one's emotions, including their inner somatic manifestations, will have a high correlation with unhealthy 9.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 13, 2020 11:40:08 GMT -5
Actually everybody I mentioned is either SeTi or else SiX (or possibly XSi creative subtype). And all of them are Nines, except Pseudo-Brando, who's probably strong 9 second on triple attached 6 lead. All the others are double or triple attached 9 leads.
Which doesn't mean Thomg was wrong and unhealthy Eights aren't also alexythimic. Though not sure what definition he was using. And then I doubt it would be all unhealthy Eights. Or, for the matter, all unhealthy Nines. Nor does it preclude other types being alexythimic at unhealthy levels without very heavy 9. Have to look into and think more about this.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 13, 2020 11:48:32 GMT -5
It does seem like SeTi and heavy Nine together with double attached is a good candidate though.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 13, 2020 11:51:35 GMT -5
Probably the double attached factor 'helps' with the depersonalization necessary to just not know what you're feeling. (Second line to 9).
Just musing.
|
|
|
Post by vincent on May 13, 2020 12:03:35 GMT -5
Actually everybody I mentioned is either SeTi or else SiX (or possibly XSi creative subtype). And all of them are Nines, except Pseudo-Brando, who's probably strong 9 second on triple attached 6 lead. All the others are double or triple attached 9 leads. Which doesn't mean Thomg was wrong and unhealthy Eights aren't also alexythimic. Though not sure what definition he was using. And then I doubt it would be all unhealthy Eights. Or, for the matter, all unhealthy Nines. Nor does it preclude other types being alexythimic at unhealthy levels. Have to look into and think more about this.
The correlation with 9 makes perfect sense imo.
And ct wise, there definetely seems to be a correlation with strong subconscious Si (ignoring, frame and possibly auxiliary in some configurations), which also makes perfect sense.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 13, 2020 12:15:42 GMT -5
The correlation with 9 makes perfect sense imo.
And ct wise, there definetely seems to be a correlation with strong subconscious Si (ignoring, frame and possibly auxiliary in some configurations), which also makes perfect sense.
Yes, and which brings us back to what you told me way back when! Frame is subconscious. It's just there. It didn't make sense to me at the time because Ni is never subconscious to me. Because I've always just been very aware that my thought process is different from most people's. Mostly they all seem to be thinking while mostly I feel like thoughts are thinking themselves through me. But if I were on a planet with a lot of Ni doms I wouldn't notice this either.
|
|