|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2020 16:18:25 GMT -5
TeSi? btw she's half Vietnamese so don't mistake genetics for 'vultological qualia'. vincent anthony
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 12, 2020 16:27:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by vincent on Apr 13, 2020 11:03:32 GMT -5
Yes, TeSi sounds right. Almost certainly interfacer dom almost certainly Te over Fe Around 2 min mark "I think all of us should accept that apology because it's extremely important that we allow each other to evolve and change our viewpoints" sounds like the very definition of Fe role under Ne agenda. FeSi trying to say the same thing would have betrayed their kumbaya quadra membership.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 13, 2020 12:44:11 GMT -5
"I think all of us should accept that apology because it's extremely important that we allow each other to evolve and change our viewpoints" sounds like the very definition of Fe role under Ne agenda. Yes, that line really caught my ear too. I was thinking of it in terms of exemplifying an agenda of open-endedness of knowledge, and of course it's in the interpersonal realm. I just didn't think of Fe role but yes. She was a commercial radio announcer who also gave advice to the lovelorn and then she just decided she should be a serious news commentator on youtube. She planned it strategically over a couple of years (and explained to us how she did it too). Now she will go and tackle big topics like the Uiygurs in China and she will tell us, I am researching this, I'm learning...she will hunker down and meticulously go through the archive (Si) in all its monotony. Then she will say 'This is what I found out, guys'. And she is always trying to see different sides and leave things open-ended. It's pretty impressive actually. She speaks softly and carries a big stick that really does seem Se demonstrative. I'm still not completely decided on whether 6 or 3 leads though and once in a blue moon I still consider 9. I think it's 6. Don't really care that much. She's triple attached and healthy so all those fixes are moving into each other at a high level.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on Apr 13, 2020 13:59:36 GMT -5
Amusingly, I'm going through my old social media email notifications now and found a reply to my comment to her one of the first times she took on a big geoopolitics topic. It was Turkey and the Kurds. I commented: ""Kim, this is too complicated to master in a couple of weeks. You'd be better off saying here's what I got now have I missed something? People think you have a hidden agenda now because you leave a lot out. It seems intentional." Someone replied: "Exactly, she shows her bias very clearly, would've been nice if she went into the reason and history the Kurds are so aggressive." My supervisee alors... "
|
|