|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 18:08:03 GMT -5
|
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Aug 11, 2021 18:15:26 GMT -5
She just doesn’t seem ‘synflow enough’ to pull it off with the muppets. Nevertheless I found it charming.
|
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Aug 11, 2021 19:11:01 GMT -5
My first impression of her was sp/SX 2w3(3w4)-6w7(5w6)-9w1(8w9) or something close to that. Sp 2 + Sx 6 strength and beauty, making a sort of "American Rock Baby Doll" initially compelled by Social 9 participation to "join in" with the Punk scene. I'm not so sure of this, though. There's something very "cutesie" about everything she does—even in her music, like in "Rapture" when she starts going on about the Man from Mars, as though she almost doesn't want anything she does to be taken very seriously.
I don't see 6w5 fix for her. There seems to be something rather "gullible," counterphobic, and gluttonous about her. Even in the Kermit video, she sort of plays the role of an unsuspecting "ditz,"
which just seems like 6w7 + 9. I mean her band is even called "Blondie." Energetically, I see 9w1 > 9w8 as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 19:13:10 GMT -5
Actually I found her to be far more at ease with those Muppets than performing or in any interview before she was a lot older anthony. Which could perhaps provide a clue as to whether she's 3 'reflector' and/or 2/3 'most interpersonal' line lead. |
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Aug 11, 2021 19:15:27 GMT -5
I'd agree with that. She did seem more at ease with the muppets. It was more that...perhaps the muppets weren't exactly at ease with her, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 19:22:24 GMT -5
Well anthony, she's paradigmatic sp/sx stacking. I don't understand why anyone chose otherwise though I'd be interested to know, if there's reasoning to it. I don't even see why people are saying she moves toward decadent, sp/SX. Very clear midstream. Heavy sp cover, stoney even, but not heavy enough to start picking up the so/sp 'priestess' vibe of SP/sx. sp and sx untethered, so when she was young the goal was just work for success, only later on when stacking moved and sx became more pronounced was the goal really art for itself (and she's much more sx 'fuse' when older too); also was able to BOTH be working and romantic partner with Stein AND separate from him and become the godmother of his child. Second instinct does NOT impinge upon first. Really, so clear midstream sp/sx to me, I can't even bring myself to write 'imo'. |
|
adrian
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 222
Enneagram Core Fix: 2w1
|
Post by adrian on Aug 11, 2021 19:27:20 GMT -5
Also isn't the 'predatory' gaze associated with midstream sp/sx too. She has both the stony sp cover and predatory look. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 19:32:47 GMT -5
Yes, they are one and the same adrian. Like a hawk. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 19:36:00 GMT -5
Because a heavy sp cover on social second is different adrian. It's not...so inscrutable. More...awkward. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 19:40:45 GMT -5
My first impression of her was sp/SX 2w3(3w4)-6w7(5w6)-9w1(8w9) or something close to that. Sp 2 + Sx 6 strength and beauty... First impression had subwings and typing backwards?  |
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Aug 11, 2021 20:08:57 GMT -5
Well, I deduced that she was sp/sx and most likely 269 tritype independently, and then I ended up correlating instinct to fix and it worked out fairly well.
And yes, my first impression did have subwings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 20:28:37 GMT -5
Okay so I have a question for anthony and everyone else. All you need is the video in the OP, where she's performing. You don't need any of the others. Is this woman comfortable in her body? |
|
anthony
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 1,537
Enneagram Core Fix: 9w1
|
Post by anthony on Aug 11, 2021 20:31:49 GMT -5
No, she isn't.
She's flailing awkwardly and there seems to be a disconnect between whatever she's thinking about doing and the actual action.
|
|
adrian
Terra9Incognita
Posts: 222
Enneagram Core Fix: 2w1
|
Post by adrian on Aug 11, 2021 20:46:13 GMT -5
"Is this woman comfortable in her body?"
Nope. She's very stiff and she looks self-conscious. All of her energy is concentrated in her head while her body has only enough to awkwardly and mechanically move around. Pre-meditated, no naturally flowing movements.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 11, 2021 20:48:50 GMT -5
No, she isn't. She's flailing awkwardly and there seems to be a disconnect between whatever she's thinking about doing and the actual action. Exactly. Unless we're at the unhealthy levels (and she seems to be at low average when young, and there's no gossip to be found about Debbie Harry hurting people or hurting herself when she was at the peak of her career, plus she was in a successful long term relationship with Stein), there are really five types that just often aren't comfortable In their bodies. Two of them are 9 and 1, emerging from the void into incarnation, and two of them are 4 and 5, reentering the void, and one is 6, climbing out of it. But 4 and 5 are DISembodied, and she's not. She's just a klutz. So it's not 1 either because 1 is going to be perfectionistically controlled and that's not what's going on. So it seems it should either be...and again there are always exceptions....but overall it seems to point to either E9 just diffuse klutzy discharge of suppressed rage, or E6 more targeted militaristic defensive protective armoring for a counterphobic attack. So which disconnect is the stronger? Fetal kicking of refusal to be born or offense as defense of the born but over-vigilant? |
|
