|
|
Post by Roshan on May 30, 2021 12:43:47 GMT -5
Another thing, that might not be completely unrelated, is that attributing "motoric sequences" "know-how" and "tactics" to T makes it heavily biased toward Te. Imo.
, if he focuses on what's wrong with Se having details and analysis in its box as is, he should discover other issues organically. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2021 12:46:22 GMT -5
Attributing 'details' and 'analysis' to Se over all other functions but one is really sloppy. And that's what the schema does as shown. Attempting to justify it by explaining it would be like putting adhesive tape on a structurally unsound building. It needs to be changed.
Yes, i absolutely agree.
Another thing, that might not be completely unrelated, is that attributing "motoric sequences" "know-how" and "tactics" to T makes it heavily biased toward Te. Imo.
That is if you think Te PoLR means being in a catatonic state except for cph impulses. |
|
|
|
Post by vincent on May 30, 2021 12:52:05 GMT -5
vincent , if he focuses on what's wrong with Se having details and analysis in its box as is, he should discover other issues organically.
Right, that's very true.
|
|
|
|
Post by vincent on May 30, 2021 13:03:34 GMT -5
That is if you think Te PoLR means being in a catatonic state except for cph impulses. Of course not.
Being Polr doesn't mean you don't "have it" nor that you only "do it" because of cph impulses.
It only means that you avoid processing it.
Anyway, Roshan is absolutely right. Focus on what's wrong with Se first. |
|
