|
Post by vincent on May 31, 2020 4:29:11 GMT -5
Beneficiary/benefactor (and supervisee/supervisor) are asymetric relationships. The benefactor (and the supervisor) has a cognitive advantage in most situations. And an greater one when there is a difference in health level. We have to understand them well enough to be able tosupervise and benefit. Especially in the areas where they don't understand themselves. Beneficiary will know what the beneficiary seek and demonstrate, and will be "immune" to peacocking and weaponizing.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 31, 2020 4:31:16 GMT -5
From the material i've seen so far, i didn't get the impression she could be Te polr/Ti tertiary.
But if she is indeed SiFe, she would be Sargon's mirage.
But he definetely doesn't seem "miraged" by her in any way.
I would have a lot of reasons to dislike her. She is quite TeSi-ish in a lot of ways.
But i don't really dislike her.
I think she gives a bad name and do a bad job for libertarian communism.
And i find her very "cringey".
I guess that's consistent with her being my supervisee.
Well, not Te polr was one of the reasons I chose FeSi over SiFe. Actually, my original choice was TeSi but then I rather quickly realized I was being tricked. Sargon is definitely not miraged by her. In fact he's taken his critique of woke feminism to a whole new level with her. I hope he realizes this. And yes, I suppose that would be consistent with her being your supervisee, being you're Te polr. My supervisees I have an immediate urge to fix.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 31, 2020 4:38:28 GMT -5
Beneficiary/benefactor (and supervisee/supervisor) are asymetric relationships. The benefactor (and the supervisor) has a cognitive advantage in most situations. And an greater one when there is a difference in health level. We have to understand them well enough to be able tosupervise and benefit. Especially in the areas where they don't understand themselves. Beneficiary will know what the beneficiary seek and demonstrate, and will be "immune" to peacocking and weaponizing.
Oh, of course. Duh. Was thinking you said he was her beneficiary. (Brain fart). Yes, she could certainly be his. She could certainly benefit from his analysis.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 31, 2020 4:52:06 GMT -5
And in case you think I'm kidding that she's trying to be Oriana Fallaci, you can check out her twitter photo and bio, vincent. Although I just noticed her pinned tweet adds another level. See, on the one hand there is the gamma or delta diva she wants to be. On the other there is that short video. And now I think I may know why I first thought TeSi. She may be trying to imitate my actual supervisee. Tiamat.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 31, 2020 5:05:51 GMT -5
Tiamat sort of alternates between being too glamorous, too emotionally overwrought, and too librarianish. Ash may have taken cues.
|
|
|
Post by vincent on May 31, 2020 5:10:10 GMT -5
I briefly thought she was TeSi too, before i realized she was alpha.
Her positioning about XR is very telling : she won't leave the campfire, but she has to mark her difference.
She is not an alpha kid. She supports them with unconditionnal love because she is sure they will grow up and evolve "in a few weeks".
She presents herselfs as the vigilant mother of the alpha kids.
She is roleplaying the adult, which makes her look more delta than she really is.
and yes, she might very well be imitating Tiamat.
|
|
|
Post by Roshan on May 31, 2020 5:13:53 GMT -5
and yes, she might very well be imitating Tiamat.
She really does seem to be trying to incorporate her flailing arm gestures, peekaboo reproach stare, and hysterical lilting vocal crescendo in that pinned video.
|
|
|
Post by vincent on May 31, 2020 8:32:55 GMT -5
and yes, she might very well be imitating Tiamat.
She really does seem to be trying to incorporate her flailing arm gestures, peekaboo reproach stare, and hysterical lilting vocal crescendo in that pinned video.
Yes she does indeed.
|
|